
Today, I experienced Ecuadorian politics at its finest. There was a coup in my class, and I have been kicked out of my presidency. It all happened so swiftly. One moment, I’m talking with my professor about the some work I missed. The next moment, a student touches me on the shoulder and asks the professor if she can talk to me for a minute. In as nice a way as she could she said, “Kat, we the people, as a united front of disgruntled students, have decided to remove you from your post as president of this class. Would that be okay with you?” The question at the end was a nice touch, like I had some choice in the matter.
I can’t exactly say that I didn’t see this coming. The seeds of insurrection had been planted long ago, yet I did expect to finish my term as queen of the universe in my remaining five months here. Unfortunately, my class had another idea. Yesterday, I could feel the tensions mounting. In my favorite class, Professor X’s class, no grades have been taken this semester. Suddenly realizing that midterm grades are due next week, he decided to give us 45 minutes to do an assignment that counted as 20% of our final grade. That seemed pretty fair to me. After all, we’ve only been in classes two months. The assignment given to us was as follows: Take whatever research you found on the internet about the philosopher Kant, choose any subject about Kant you want, somehow relate this unrelated topic to education, and present it to the class. Now, I was a philosophy major, but I definitely had to do a little bit of a refresher about Kant, so I grabbed someone else’s internet research and started reading. Meanwhile, my group discussed what topic they should pick for the presentation. I suggested what I thought would be the easiest, Kant’s famous categorical imperative. My group stared at me with blank eyes. After a little bit more reading, I suggested to my group Kant’s “Copernican Revolution” of philosophy. Again, blank stares. However, after much insistence, my group said, “Okay, whatever you want to do as long as you are going to present it.” Bingo – more Spanish practice for me. Luckily, we didn’t have enough time to present that same day, and Mr. X told us we’d present first thing the following morning. I went home, did some research, and came to class ready with a good 15 minute presentation that started with a little history of philosophy before Kant, then moved to David Hume who woke Kant up from his “dogmatic slumber,” and finished with how Kant completely changed the history of philosophy, hence Kant’s “Copernican Revolution” of philosophy. Not forgetting the main point, I prepared some far-stretched implications of Kant’s ideas on present day curriculum and classroom instruction.
Like I have now grown accustomed to, when I arrived to class the following morning, the rules of the game had magically changed. Mr. X informed us that, just to be fair and unbiased, he would now select a student panel of four judges to grade our presentations. I mean, this all sounded fair to me. It’s only 20% of our entire grade. Let’s not even mention the fact that there were six total groups and that only four groups had someone acting as a judge. Then, Mr. X threw in another stipulation. Presentations can be no longer than five minutes. Now, if anyone can tell me how five minutes gives any philosophical thought justice, then I’ll shut up. Furthermore, how is it fair that you tell presenters that the day of the presentation what their time limit is?
I volunteered to present first knowing that my presentation was a great introductory speech to Kant. “No volunteers,” the professor said, “We’re going to make this fair. Let’s draw numbers.” Of course, I drew number 6. Dead last. The introduction goes dead last. Luckily, one of my classmates drew number 2, and switched with me. Okay, introduction coming second. I can deal with that.
A petite, shy girl approached the class. Apparently, she had drawn number one. Her topic was Kant on ethics. “This should be interesting,” I thought and settled back in my chair. Number one proceeded to enlighten the class on Kant’s ethical theory, none of which seemed very clear to me. After three minutes, she left the class in awkward silence with a look that said, “I’m done.” Some in the class responded with a look that said, “That’s all you got,” others with a blank stare that said, “What the hell did you just say?” I responded with a look that said, “How can you talk about Kantian ethics without talking about his most important idea, the categorical imperative?” Now, I realize that the categorical imperative is not common knowledge, but anyone who has remotely researched Kant’s ethical ideas would not fail to mention this basis for Kant’s entire moral system.
The teacher asked if anyone had any questions. Being quite familiar with Ecuadorian culture, I know that it’s much more cooperative and indirect than the United States. Students don’t ask each other questions that another student couldn’t answer. Rather, they ask the presenter questions that the presenter surely knows. I, however, did have a question, a rather simple one at that for the presenter. I knew that culturally I shouldn’t ask it. I knew I would get mean looks from the class. But I also knew that I would be betraying my own notions of education if I didn’t ask. I raised my hand and directed my question, “What does the categorical imperative have to do with Kant’s ethics?”
The presenter blankly stared, clearly not even really understanding my question. The rest of the class bored their eyes into me like the revolutionaries must have bored into Benedict Arnold. I could tell I’d crossed into dangerous territory. Students tried to intervene and rescue the floundering speaker, “But that question doesn’t really go with ethics. It’s our topic. We are presenting on the categorical imperative.” Great. Two groups that know what they are doing.
Presenter One sat down, and the judges voted the group a 1.5.
It was my turn to present. Knowing that I would take longer than 5 minutes, I asked the professor if I could have a longer time if what I said was worth using more than five minutes. The professor gave me permission for extra time. My speech lasted a good 10 minutes, the class seemed interested, and my information was solid. I even managed to relate Kant’s revolution to a new way of looking at how we educate students. Questions followed. The professor had questions. All in all, I’d say it was good.
Until the judges came back with my grade. 1.5
1.5?!? I just shook my head. 1.5? Rather than being upset with a low score, I was upset that my work was seen on the same level as the previously presented. Mostly, I was insulted. Some of my classmates were also clearly upset. I think more because they were thinking, “If that got a 1.5, what am I going to get?” The teacher looked at the judges and asked them why I had gotten that score. One particular judge, we’ll call him Carlos, responded, “Well, it’s because it wasn’t really related with the theme. It didn’t have anything to do with education. Furthermore, she went for 15 minutes, and the time limit was only five minutes.”
There are certain moments when you are living in another culture when you can’t decide whether to get upset or just laugh. I decided to just sit in my seat, put a smile on my face, and consol myself with the fact that none of what Carlos was saying was true. The insurrection had begun.
After several students spoke for me and defended me against all of Carlos’s accusations, the teacher overruled the judging panel and gave me a 2 out of 2. While happy with the raised grade, I then became upset about the teacher undermining the judging panel, basically, nullifying its opinion. However, this experience made me well aware that certain people in the class hated me.
Today, I was sitting in class, minding my own business, when the insurrection happened. It started with one voice, then two, and then, before I even knew it, the whole class was up in arms about “directiva” of the class. People started to list their complaints against me. One voice saying, “We just elected her because she was the foreigner, and a teacher, but she can’t do her job.” Another voice, “Where was she yesterday afternoon when we had to elect the beauty queen of the faculty? There were only 15 students there supporting our class queen. It’s her fault there weren’t more.” The complaints continued about things that I didn’t do, most of which I had no idea I was supposed to do. For being an indirect culture, everyone was beginning to talk very directly.
I rose to defend myself, or at least speak my peace of mind. Gathering myself, I said, “First of all, I agree with this discussion, and have no problem with it. However, I would like you to know that I wasn’t at the election of the queen yesterday because I couldn’t be there. I teach in the afternoons as you all know. Secondly, I have asked you all to tell me what I’m supposed to do because I don’t exactly know. Thirdly, it’s not right to be talking about overthrowing a student from their office when they are not here to defend themselves (referring to the vice-president who was absent from the class that day).”
Thankfully, the students listened to me and immediately called up the vicepresident on his cell phone to ask him if it was okay if they voted him out of office. Here promptly agreed. What else are you to do when the people speak?
Five minutes later another nomination for class officers was held, and my name did not appear on the open ballot. If it comes as any shock, the class elected Carlos as their new president. For the rest of the class, the Carlos continued to use the phrase, the new directive is suggesting we do this or the new directive suggests we do that. The class ended with, “The new directive is going to buy every single one of you a beer. Let’s go to the bar!”
As I sat in the bar drinking my free beer, I began to reminisce on my time in power. I thought, “Well, maybe this new regime isn’t so bad after all. If I knew that I was going to get free drinks, I would have resigned long ago.” As I reflect on my short term in office, I must admit I didn’t take full advantage of my time ruling my underlings. I never laundered money or gave important posts to my friends. But my biggest regret was that I wasn’t in office quite long enough to win the Nobel Peace Prize.




Recent Comments